(2000a) “Functionalism, Sport and Society”, in E. Cratty (eds) New Perspectives of Man in Action, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (1969) “Game Forms, Social Structure, and Anomie”, in R. (1996) “The Odds of Transiting From One Level of Sports Participation to Another”, Sociology of Sport Journal, 13, 3: 288–299. (1994) Sport and Leisure in Social Thought, London: Routledge. (1961) “How Does It Come To Be So?” The New Yorker (28 January): pp. Merton (eds) Continuities in Structural Inquiry, London: Sage. Rossi (ed.) Structural Sociology, New York: Columbia University Press. (1982) “The Oppression of Women - A Structuralist Marxist View”, in I. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, London: Falmer Press. (1984) The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press. Eitzen (ed.) (3rd edition) Sport in Contemporary Society, New York: St Martin’s Press. (1989) “Black Participation in American Sport Since World War II”, in D.S. (1998) “Performance and Reality: Race, Sports and the Modern World”, The Nation (10–17 August): 11–20.Įitzen, D.S. Merton, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Ĭrothers, C. Coser (ed.) The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, London: Falmer Press.Ĭoser, L. Rossi (ed.) Structural Sociology, New York: Columbia University Press.Ĭlark, J., Modgil, C. (1982) “The Structural Sources of French Structuralism”, in I. (2003) “Robert Merton Dies”, The scientist.Google ScholarĬlark, P.P. Coser (ed.) “The Idea of Social Structure”, American Journal of Sociology, 86: 1356–1361.īrickley, P. (1981) Continuities in Structural Inquiry, London: Sage Publications.īoudon, R. Merton: Consensus and Controversy, London: Falmer Press.īlau, P.M. (1990) “The Interplay of Social Theory and Empirical Research”, in J. (1967) Toward a Theory of Minority-Group Relations, New York: John Wiley.īlalock, H. (1962) “Occupational Discrimination”, Social Problems, 9: 240–247.īlalock, H. (1983) The Consensus-Conflict Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.īlalock, H. (1988) Culture and Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īernard, T. (1984) “Social-Structural Analysis”, Sociological Quarterly, 25: 5–26.Īrcher, M. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īlexander, J. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Merton and Talcott Parsons were the twin theoretical towers of structural-functionalism. Although the degree of dominance of structural-functionalism in general sociology and sport sociology is a moot matter (see Loy & Booth, 2000a), there is no doubt that Robert K. From the perspective of sport sociology, Jarvie and Maguire contend that structural-functionalism “played a key part in the early development of the sociology of sport in North America and on both sides of what was then the European ‘iron curtain’ ” (1994, p. Many sociologists argue that “structural-functionalism” was the dominant theoretical perspective in sociology between the late 1930s and the early 1960s, especially in North America.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |